May 31, 2004
Another Day, Another Challenge
I'm diddling about with Chez Cheese, and it occurs to me I'd like to have categories. Now, I've consulted the MT users manual and looked about at other blogs and mucked about with my template... all to no avail.
So can someone tell me what code to insert, where to insert it, and how to make a linkable list on my sidebar pointing to categories? Also, can I go back into my previous entries and assign them to a category as well?
Or should I just give up and go back to
boobie pics what I know?
Thanks in advance.
Posted by: LeeAnn at
09:19 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Assuming you've got the same stuff as I do, this should work:
Login and click "manage weblog" on Cheese Stands Alone.
Click on "weblog config" on the left menu.
Click on "preferences" (along the near top of the page)
Scroll down until you see the bold world "Archives" (or "Archiving" pehaps) maybe 2/3 of the way down.
Where it says "preferred method of archiving", select "Categories", then SAVE it. (but don't bother to rebuild yet.)
At the top again (where you earlier clicked "preferences") Click of "Archives".
Scroll down to the selection and click on all methods of archiving you would like enabled. I (and most) use "Individual", "Monthly" and "Categories".
SAVE it.
Now you can REBUILD the templates.
After you've Rebuilt, click on New Entry. The category field (box) should be over the right top of the main entry body field, and just to the right of the Title field. If it's there, YAY! If it's not, D'OH!
To assign a Category to all of your past posts you'll have to open them individually, add the category in the field and then SAVE.
NOW you'll have to create a sidetitle for the categories to display them in the sidebar since you probably don't have one.
That's probably just a matter of copy/pasting some html. Let me look around.....
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 31, 2004 11:20 PM (v/S3n)
2
Here is the html for the Categories sidetitle:
(The word
Contents in the second line is what the categories will be titled. If you want to change it to, say,
Cultures of Cheese or something, just replace it before you copy/paste it.)........
Contents
">
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 31, 2004 11:28 PM (v/S3n)
3
D'OH!!!!! That html did post!!! yikes!!!
Well, it's easy enough to just go to Blather Review, click View -> Source and scroll down 'til you find the html. Though the parentheses will be those sharpy angled thingies, it'll look alot like this:
(div class="sidetitle")
Contents
(/div)
(div class="side")
(MTCategories)
(a href="($MTCategoryArchiveLink$)")($MTCategoryLabel$)(/a)(br)
(/MTCategories)
(/div)
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 31, 2004 11:33 PM (v/S3n)
4
First, go to your
Weblog Config. Select
Archiving. Put a check in the box left of
Category. [SAVE]
Next, open your Main Index Template. Copy the following code into your sidebar where you want the list of categories to appear:
<div class="sidetitle">
Moldy Cheese [Archives]
</div>
<div class="side">
<MTCategories>
<a href="<$MTArchiveLink$>" title="Read all the <$MTCategoryLabel$> posts"><$MTCategoryLabel$> (<$MTCategoryCount$>)</a>
<br />
</MTCategories>
</div>
This will give you a list of categories, the number of posts in that category, and title popup when you hover over the link.
You can add categories in your post edit screen or use the
categories in the left toolbar to add several at one time. Don't foget to [SAVE] after using the sidebar method.
As for adding the categories to old posts, I recommend adding your category list first, then use the power-edit mode to assign categories to old posts via the drop-down menu in the category column. [SAVE] & [REBUILD] after you finish. It will take you a while to add categories to all the old posts, have fun!
One thing to remember... your rebuild times will be increased every time you post or comment due to the extra archives being rebuilt.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 31, 2004 11:36 PM (Rmawx)
5
Crapola... I guess Spork and I were answering at the same time.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 31, 2004 11:38 PM (Rmawx)
6
Also, you can assign more than one category to each post. The add secondary category link will appear after you save your post the first time.
Don't forget to read the Helpful Thingy
Trickle Posting for delayed posting instructions.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 31, 2004 11:48 PM (Rmawx)
7
This is exactly why I don't have to be a genius.
I have genius friends.
Thanks, y'all.
Posted by: LeeAnn at May 31, 2004 11:50 PM (HxCeX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Mozilla Madness - Radius Corners
I noticed over at Rob's new Xset design that he had really neat rounded corners for all his boxes. I thought that was a neat effect to soften the hard edges of most common designs.
I've been poking around the last week or so trying to look at different methods for making these rounded corners. I discovered several different methods, but none that are really fast and easy. All methods involved images and adding 1 or more div classes to your CSS and Main Index Template. All but one method were static width solutions that would not resize with a liquid width column.
Until I ran across this gem while I was looking at some WordPress templates.
-moz-border-radius: 10px;
This code, inserted
after the other border declarations in that div will result in a bordered box with rounded or radiused corners. This will only display in Mozilla browsers. I guess you could say it is a bonus for using a standards compliant browser.
If you want to selectively insert radiused corners, you would use the following code to achieve a radius on each corner of the box.
-moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px;
-moz-border-radius-topright: 10px;
-moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 10px;
-moz-border-radius-bottomright: 10px;
It appears to me (on my monitor anyway) that the bottom radii render a a bit more jagged than the top radii for some reason. Maybe it's my video driver or just something on my end.
Below is a thumbnailed screen shot from Madfish Willie's Cyber Saloon. I went kind of crazy and radiied everything with a corner. All the radii are 10px, the comments are 9px, and the comment numbers are 8px top and 9px bottom.
more...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at
05:07 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 296 words, total size 2 kb.
1
If you are using Mozilla, you can see a better sample of the effects by looking at my skins - Purple Lines & Purple Lines Mozilla.
If you are not using Mozilla, I highly recommend dwonloading and installing. Then, mess around with it a little bit. Make sure to go through all the menus and look at the neat stuff there. Whatever you do, get off that POS IE from Microsoft.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 31, 2004 05:32 AM (r8ngf)
2
I'm using the ALA custom corners technique but it was a bitch to implement. If you dot mind IE users not getting the full effect then using Moz Styles is the way to go.
Posted by: Rob at May 31, 2004 03:42 PM (BWDMP)
3
I saw one that used images for the top an bottom of the sidebar elements, but that was a fixed width solution. That was the easiest all-around solution for a fixed width element. Sadly, nothing that eloquent for liquid width elements.
As far as IE users, they just have to miss out for now.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 31, 2004 06:43 PM (Rmawx)
4
Cool.
I'm planing to do rounded corners in my new layout, and this makes it much much easier.
And people who persist in using IE deserve what they get. Or in this case, don't get.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 02, 2004 07:26 AM (kOqZ6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 30, 2004
Of interest to some?
Blog Software Breakdown
Posted by: Tiger at
03:34 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 7 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Very nice. He likes WordPress. I tried it when I had my own server space and I liked it fairly well; I just couldn't get the latest version to install on my server. (Frustration levels are always low with me and I'm sure it was totally Operator Error.)
Thanks, Tiger.
Posted by: Emma at May 30, 2004 07:14 AM (NOZuy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I coulda, woulda done ---
Hey, see all those nasty beastiality links in the comments? If I had of had access to the comments in my MT console, they would be gone.
By the way, if you have noticed a lack of updating to the Beyond the Black Hole blog, it seems that we noticed a lack of interest in what we had to say. Bill Bulldog, Bird Brain and myself have been discussing what to do with the space. Miss Kitty, as usual, is just being catty.
Posted by: Mr Mouse at
02:49 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, I zapped about 67 of them from a bunch of blogs.
Good luck with whatever you do with the blog, too.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 30, 2004 12:11 PM (+S1Ft)
2
Well, I've always liked it... when I got around to visiting. You guys should maybe say more about your links than you do. Or, like, when Miss Kitty linked to the giant fish: embed the photo into the post. The problem might be that you're not showing enough and a reader has no idea if clicking on the links is worth it. Or, maybe you need to develope more of a structured story-line; something that'll give us more insight to life around and beyond the black hole. I dunno, I'm just an inanimate musical luncheon utensil, but there's about you critters and reading your blog that just makes me happy. Here's some cheese.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 31, 2004 07:25 PM (v/S3n)
3
Maybe you could host a
Barking of the Dogs Carnival or a
Kitty Cat Carnival and dispaly a bunch of images to blog pets. Be sure to link back to a post and not just the blog so there is a trackback ping to your post. Then, go drink several more beers.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 31, 2004 11:43 PM (Rmawx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 29, 2004
Thingys & Doodads - Ecosystem Rank
Tired of being an Insignificant Microbe or Flappy Bird or Marauding Marsupial in the TTBL Ecosystem?
Want to show those Large Mammals and Mortal Humans a thing or two?
Well, now you can be a Giant Man-Eating Alligator or Tyrannosaurus Rex or even a Drunken Idiot if you choose to be.
All you have to do is modify EZ Bear's Ecosystem script. I got this from our very own Toasted Marshmellow, Emma at Miss Apropos.
Here's how to do it:
more...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at
04:46 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
1
::: curtsey :::
My pleasure!
Posted by: Emma at May 29, 2004 05:21 AM (NOZuy)
2
I a not too sure who was the first to do so, but I think our own Pixy Misa was the first Munuvian on the band wagon and I recently changed from bein' a
Pickled Pig's Foot as I had been for several months to bein'
the Very Model of a Modern Major General. Jes' sayin', ya know?
Posted by: Tiger at May 29, 2004 09:01 PM (G5PGV)
3
Yanno what? I don't recall WHERE I first saw it, but I think you may be right, Tiger. If I had to guess where I saw the change-up of the TLB stuff, it was more than likely on Pixy's site.
I sit corrected.
Posted by: Emma at May 30, 2004 12:15 AM (NOZuy)
4
There was a period shortly after the script was made available when the Ecosystem site was down a lot - which meant your blog would have problems if you were using the script.
So I just hard-coded mine.

I don't know if I was the first, but I hadn't seen anyone else do it at the time.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 30, 2004 12:14 PM (+S1Ft)
5
HE'S ALIVE!!!
And, regarding the comment hard-coding (gawd, I love techno-talk): That's why you're the Bestest, Pixy. . .you know everything!
Posted by: Emma at May 30, 2004 11:40 PM (NOZuy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
New Tear
Anyone know what a
new tear attack is? My firewall seems to intercept them all the time.
UPDATE: Hey ya'll, I just put up my new title graphic. Anyone want to go have a look and tell me what ya think? Yeah, just as I figured, all of ya'll are too busy. Oh well! ;)
Posted by: notGeorge at
12:16 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nice! I likes it!
You might wanna lighten up on the self-flaggelation, hon. The welts are showing. I say this as a fellow self-deprecator from waaay back.
I really wish I could do more with graphics; but everything I make looks like something the cat yakked up on the carpet. LOL
Posted by: Emma at May 29, 2004 04:02 AM (NOZuy)
2
I like it! Though, I think I have to admit that in the end and all things considered I liked the previous one slightly better.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 29, 2004 04:45 AM (uSI/A)
3
I am completely lost on the self-flaggelation part?
Posted by: Tiger at May 29, 2004 09:04 PM (G5PGV)
4
Don't beat yourself up over it.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 30, 2004 12:03 AM (Nj8r1)
5
I was trying to jokingly refer to this:
UPDATE: Hey ya'll, I just put up my new title graphic. Anyone want to go have a look and tell me what ya think? Yeah, just as I figured, all of ya'll are too busy. Oh well!
Apparently, it backfired.
I shall now go throw myself on a sword.
Posted by: Emma at May 30, 2004 12:18 AM (NOZuy)
6
Bein' so utterly sleep deprived, please allow me to throw myself on the sword, afterall, you can see how obviously
I would miss the point, hence my actual chances of survival would be stupendously great.
Posted by: Tiger at May 30, 2004 12:36 AM (G5PGV)
7
Sleep deprivation? There's another thing we have in common! LOL!
So, no sword-diving for either of us, mmmkay?
Posted by: Emma at May 30, 2004 12:49 AM (NOZuy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Carnival of the Vanities
I don't know how many of ya'll are aware that I am gonna be hostin' next week's Carnival of Vanities, and the followin' week, Pixy Misa is the host.
It is time for all Munuvians to shine, so send me your submissions. roguegenius[at]hotmail[dot]com COTV in the subject, give me the URL and title to the post you are submittin'. I'll do the rest.
Posted by: Tiger at
12:03 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
May 28, 2004
Help a Munuvian Out?
Not me;
Ace of Spades. He could use some design assistance, as his archives are not currently accessible the way things are set up.
I recommended Rob at XSet to him just off the top of my head, but I think there are more than a few Munuvians out there who have the requisite mad skillz with respect to MT design, no?
Anyone feeling charitable? Go lend the guy a hand.
Posted by: Ilyka at
09:21 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
1
GAWD, I wish I knew more about that stuff. I'm more than willing to lend a hand -- or whatever body parts are helpful.
Okay. All right. I have less-than-pure thoughts about the guy. I've always said that if a man can write well AND make me laugh -- whew. Probably best I DON'T go tiptoeing barefoot through the archives -- might lead to an obsession. Aheh.
Seriously, folks. Whatever I can do to help. . .
Posted by: Emma at May 29, 2004 04:05 AM (NOZuy)
2
Okay. All right. I have less-than-pure thoughts about the guy.
Ooh, girl, back it on up. Looks like you and I are going to have to
throw down on this one.
Posted by: ilyka at May 29, 2004 04:40 AM (DyQml)
3
Rut roh.
I have the feeling you would have my kidneys for breakfast.
I'll just keep my less-than-pure thoughts and my body parts to myself. My husband will be so pleased. Aheh.
Posted by: Emma at May 29, 2004 05:25 AM (NOZuy)
4
Ace:
I left you a comment on your blog (sorry 'bout the length, but I hate it when people throw off a high level explanation that often leaves the recipient scratching their head even harder).
Lemme know if I can be any help.
And Emma... if Ilyka's got the sexy funny writer all tied up (now there's a visual!) maybe you like to try the vauguely intellectual problem solver instead? You know what they say... once you've gone geek, you'll never go back!
Paul
Posted by: Light & Dark at May 29, 2004 05:45 AM (Hrm9v)
5
Paul,
I'll get the rope. You. . .stand there and look cute.
Posted by: Emma at May 29, 2004 05:50 AM (NOZuy)
6
if Ilyka's got the sexy funny writer all tied up
As if! And you know, Emma, funny thing: the boyfriend is not liking this discussion at all.
Imagine that.
Well, that'll teach him to rent Robert McNamara films, maybe. I can hope. I mean, there is just nothing sexy or funny about McNamara.
Posted by: ilyka at May 29, 2004 05:51 AM (DyQml)
7
McNamara? Eeesh. I don't blame you a bit, ilyka. Heh.
As for me? I remember when saying "I'll be your Mrs. Robinson" was more of a JOKE than a reality.
::: sobs quietly :::
Posted by: Emma at May 29, 2004 06:11 AM (NOZuy)
8
I'm standing, I'm standing...
Posted by: Light & Dark at May 29, 2004 06:44 AM (Hrm9v)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
the look
Have you ever seriously courted a woman who made you feel as shy as a teenager at a high school dance because you felt a special attraction to her? Have you taken your time during that courtship, being careful not to rush the relationship, because you didn't want to fuck things up?
Did you bide your time, handle everything like a total gentleman and then finally see THE LOOK? I have, three times in my life.
THE LOOK is something that you can't plan and you can't schedule. It happens when the time is right and you'll know it when you see it. It's all in the eyes, which suddenly seem to sparkle like the stars in a clear, midnight sky. If you look closely, you'll see a strange combination of surrender, challenge and fear in those eyes, and if you look too deeply, you'll feel as if you're one step away from plunging off a cliff into deep, mysterious waters.
You feel surrender, challenge and fear, too.
When you see THE LOOK, you know that the woman wants you as much as you want her. She wants you THIS NIGHT and she's ready to give herself entirely to you. The touch of her hand suddenly feels different. She walks more closely with you. A kiss on the sidewalk turns into an embrace and you want to burn with a blue flame from sheer passion. You want to meld with that woman's soul.
You don't have sex after you've seen THE LOOK. You make love, and it feels wonderful. After that first night, you'll never see the same look again, but you'll always remember it. And it will send tingles down your spine.
I haven't seen THE LOOK in a long, long time, and I miss it.
Posted by: Key at
08:23 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I think you posted this in the wrong blog... but it's really good reading anyway.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 09:04 PM (rQ9MS)
2
That would be my guest blogger who got incredibly lost!
Rob would be the one chasing the look...pas moi(...at least not in females.)
Posted by: Key at May 28, 2004 09:33 PM (Xpo0k)
3
I'm glad Rob made the mistake. I might have missed the post.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 29, 2004 12:30 AM (uSI/A)
4
Now, THERE'S a guy we need to get moved over here.
Maybe then his blog would stop getting hacked, or whatever the hell keeps happening to him.
Besides, this guy has inspired more people to blog (including me) than any other single blogger I know of.
Posted by: Stevie at May 29, 2004 04:45 AM (kNf/l)
5
If I was going to get lost, I seem to have picked a good place to do it.
Posted by: Acidman at May 29, 2004 07:03 PM (MdHRM)
Posted by: SpaceMonkey at May 29, 2004 07:08 PM (qSKHX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Is it me or Susie?
A few days ago I cloicked ontp Practical Penumbra and got a post from February 20th titled, I think, "Sheesh! Learn to spell!". I refreshed and I got the current page.
But, for three days in a row now, all I can get -- refreshments included -- is that dang Feb 20th post.
Is anyone else having this problem? Every other blog loads fine. I'm in Mozilla 1.6, but I get the same result in IE.
Can everybody else read Susie? I need my Susie fix!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at
02:16 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You are a freak [

]... I clicked over to your site and clicked thru to Susie'sand it came up OK to today's post... If you knew Susie, like I know Susie... it must be a malfunction in your box or something.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 02:56 AM (rQ9MS)
2
Odd. Daniel sent me an e-mail saying he was getting that on my site. I figured he was just off his rocker and paid him no heed.
Posted by: Jennifer at May 28, 2004 05:19 AM (YeEQQ)
3
Hmm... Though I am often off my rocker, in this case I am not. If I go to jl.mu.nu, I get a February 20 post (and the old banner); however, if I go to jenlars.mu.nu, it is up-to-date
Posted by: Daniel at May 28, 2004 02:05 PM (Oc6V9)
4
As long as it's not a malfunction in
my box....
Harv and Victor have had problems getting my recentest posts, too...I have no idea what's up with that, because I always check my newest posts for typos so I KNOW they are there....
Posted by: Susie at May 28, 2004 03:06 PM (Fs1Nj)
5
Daniel, that sounds like you're ending up on the old server (which is, yes, still alive). Weird.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 28, 2004 08:37 PM (+S1Ft)
6
I sometimes have problems on my own blog gettin' it to refresh. I have to redo the URL in the address box, changin' it from http://tig.mu.nu/index.html to http://tig.mu.nu/ or visa versa just to get see how the updates look. It seems to only do that on my home computer with the dial up. I do not remember such happenin' on my office system through the cable. Of course, my memory is not that good anyway.
Posted by: Tiger at May 29, 2004 12:00 AM (G5PGV)
7
Daniel was right. I replaced pp.mu.nu with practicalpenumbra.mu.nu in my blogroll and I got to the current posts. It's not the server or the URL itself, though, since Madfish got to the current page through my blogroll. Hmmm.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 29, 2004 12:38 AM (uSI/A)
8
I got the same behavior with Susie's blog in the last couple of days too.... by following a link of her own from one of her comments elsewhere. The linked address was pp.m.nu, and when I typed in the full blog name instead, the current page came up fine. Maybe the abbreviated addresses are somehow being pointed to the old server?
Posted by: Light & Dark at May 29, 2004 03:48 AM (Hrm9v)
9
Drat! I ALWAYS type "pp.mu.nu" in comments urls because it's so much quicker; otherwise by the time I have typed the long address I have forgotten what I was going to say...
Posted by: Susie at May 29, 2004 03:50 PM (Fs1Nj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More Tech Questions
I have a bouquet of them this time; let me know if any of you have the answers:
1) Do I need to figure out a way to place my SiteMeter icon on pages other than my main page? Another blogger told me I need to do that--but since it's on my sidebar, shouldn't it know whenever someone visits my site? I tried to figure out how to get the icon to display when someone follows a permalink back, but I had a hard time with that. But I do know that I'm still getting more "page views" per week than I am "unique visits." So it must be counting pages other than the main page. Right?
2) Does anyone know the html for an em-dash? I have a "cheat sheet," but it doesn't work. Unless I'm not supposed to be placing the given code in < >'s. Please advise.
3) How do I create an RSS feed for my site? People are asking, and I'm lost at sea on that.
Thanks so much for all your help--past, present, and future. You are the bestest friends a bloggirl could have.
Posted by: Attila at
01:24 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 192 words, total size 1 kb.
1
1) Cut and paste your sitemeter code into all your archive templates. That way when anybody access them they wiull be counted as a visit. That is when sitemeter is bothering to even count. They miss about 40% - 50% of your visits. Compare their numbers with your cPanel numbers and you'll see what I mean.
2) Try [& m d a s h ;]Take out the spaces between the & and ; If that doesn't work
go here for more codes.
3) I think Jim is the resident MuNu RSS expert. Have you tried a MuNu search or Google search?
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 02:04 AM (rQ9MS)
2
I *think* this is how it's done.
To place the feeds on your sidebar:
1) First, check your Templates within MT: you should have RSS 1.0 and RSS 2.0 available.
2) Go to your Main Index, find the place on your sidebar that you want to include these links, and add these URLs:
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
If you need more help, let me know.
Posted by: Emma at May 28, 2004 03:23 AM (NOZuy)
3
DRAT. Let's try this again.
(Without the square brackets. Place them in regular brackets, i.e. "")
RSS 1.0:
[a href="http://littlemissattila.mu.nu/index.rdf"]
RSS 2.0:
[a href="http://littlemissattila.mu.nu/index.xml"]
Posted by: Emma at May 28, 2004 03:25 AM (NOZuy)
4
Ms Emma: replace the < bracket with
& l t ; (take out the spaces first) and MT won't parse the code.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 03:34 AM (rQ9MS)
5
Emma's got it exactly right and those files are out there and working. Most aggregators should be able to find the feeds by themselves but go ahead and put the links up. Never hurts to advertise. ;-)
Posted by: Jim at May 28, 2004 03:02 PM (IOwam)
6
Well... if Emma says do it... Imma doin it.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 07:42 PM (rQ9MS)
7
Jim: Is there any editing that you did on your templates?
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 07:43 PM (rQ9MS)
8
Um . . . so I'm supposed to use the material in square brackets, but replace those with normal html brackets ()? And all will be good?
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 29, 2004 01:01 PM (LcVoH)
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 29, 2004 03:44 PM (rQ9MS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 27, 2004
Thingys & Doodads - Site Stats
I ran across some code over at the MT Support Forum the other day. I think you may like it. It's just a few lines to count the total number of blogs entries, total number of comments, and a comment/entry ratio. I modified it for my site and put it with my other site statistics like the sitemeter and ecosystem scripts.
Here is the code:
Total Entries: <MTBlogEntryCount><br />
Total Comments: <MTBlogCommentCount><br />
Comments/Entry:
<?
echo number_format(<MTBlogCommentCount>/<MTBlogEntryCount>,2);
?>
<hr />
Here is the ouptput:
more...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at
11:53 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
1
NIFTY!
I really really like your default skin, MW. It's veddy niiice.
Posted by: Emma at May 28, 2004 03:27 AM (NOZuy)
2
Thanks. :-) I've been wondering how people do that.
Posted by: Jennifer at May 28, 2004 07:53 PM (DdBLw)
3
Pretty pretty MW, Thank you! Don't have to go to the candy store with you around!
Posted by: Alex. at May 29, 2004 12:20 AM (MNwPu)
Posted by: SpaceMonkey at May 31, 2004 02:26 PM (DN55C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thingys & Doodads - Best of Me
Let's say you want to display a list of links to some of your best posts... the stuff you are really proud of (my list would be empty, but that's another story)... how would you do that?
I was doing a blog tweak for Linda at Auteriffic, and she asked me if I could do something with a select category for her poetry to display in the sidebar. I don't think this is what she was looking for, but it exactly what you need to display a "best of me" series of posts in your sidebar.
Enable your category archives.
Create a Best of Me category.
Assign that category to the posts you want to display.
Cut & Paste the following code into your sidebar where you want your list to appear.
<div class="sidetitle">
Best of Me
</div>
<div class="side">
<MTEntries category="Best of Me" sort_by="title" sort_order="ascend">
<a href="<$MTEntryPermalink$>">
<$MTEntryTitle$>
</a>
<br />
</MTEntries>
</div>
I have the code sample up over at the
MadLab, at the bottom of the sidebar, if you want to see what the output is. I used an existing category for testing. There are only four posts in that category, but you'll get the idea.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at
07:23 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That's sweet. Could you do it so they are grouped by their main category? So the output would look something like:
Category 1
post a
post d
post f
Category 2
post c
Category 3
post b
post e
Posted by: Jim at May 28, 2004 01:33 PM (IOwam)
2
I think it would look something like this:
<div class="sidetitle">
Best of Me
</div>
<div class="side">
<b>Category A</b>
<MTEntries category="Category A" sort_by="title" sort_order="ascend">
<a href="">
<$MTEntryTitle$>
</a>
<br />
</MTEntries>
<b>Category B</b>
<MTEntries category="Category B" sort_by="title" sort_order="ascend">
<a href="">
<$MTEntryTitle$>
</a>
<br />
</MTEntries>
<b>Category C</b>
<MTEntries category="Category C" sort_by="title" sort_order="ascend">
<a href="">
<$MTEntryTitle$>
</a>
<br />
</MTEntries>
</div>
I haven't tested it, but I'm sure it would work just fine for your site.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 01:40 PM (rQ9MS)
3
That would work for picking categories by hand. I was thinking of assigning the "best of" category to whatever posts are the really good ones and then displaying like I have mine now. Breaking all of the "best of" ones out by their other category.
Can you specify two categories? Like yours above with one addition:
<div class="sidetitle">
Best of Me
</div>
<div class="side">
<b>Category A</b>
<MTEntries category="Category A" MTEntries category="Best of" sort_by="title" sort_order="ascend">
<a href="">
<$MTEntryTitle$>
</a>
<br />
</MTEntries>
<b>Category B</b>
<MTEntries category="Category B" MTEntries category="Best of" sort_by="title" sort_order="ascend">
<a href="">
<$MTEntryTitle$>
</a>
<br />
</MTEntries>
<b>Category C</b>
<MTEntries category="Category C" MTEntries category="Best of" sort_by="title" sort_order="ascend">
<a href="">
<$MTEntryTitle$>
</a>
<br />
</MTEntries>
</div>
Posted by: Jim at May 28, 2004 03:09 PM (IOwam)
4
Oops. The second "MTEntries" in each of those shouldn't be there.
Posted by: Jim at May 28, 2004 03:09 PM (IOwam)
5
I don't know if that would work or not... try and let us know.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 07:59 PM (rQ9MS)
6
I just tested that out at the MadLab. It took the four primary entries and filtered them down to the two secondary entries. Good One, Jim!!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 28, 2004 08:06 PM (rQ9MS)
7
Sweet! Now I just have to figure out how to combine that with collapsable lists.
I'm guessing that if I add enough complexity to this one item I can create a wormhole that takes me to geek heaven.
Posted by: Jim at May 29, 2004 04:45 PM (saeHM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Comments go ker-splish
Hello Munuviana! I got an email this a.m. from my blog-bud, Loren. He wrote:
Linda, we have a problem with the site. I was posting replies to comments -- this is how I'm going to handle comments from now on (and I will post a notice to that effect) -- and got bounced off at about 11:25. Couldn't get back on again until almost 1 a.m., and this is the fourth of fifth time this has happened.
Not sure that this was anything but an ISP hiccup, but has anyone else had probs posting comments late at night in the N. Hemisphere (like maybe during a backup, or something)?
Just wondering's, all.
Cheers,
Linda
Posted by: Linda at
03:57 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I haven't experienced any problems either commenting or posting during that time frame. Sounds like a weird problem though. Good luck fingering it out.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 27, 2004 06:09 PM (rQ9MS)
2
We
did have a problem for about an hour - and depending on where Loren lives, it may well have been that. Verio was updating one of their routers, which is the same thing that took us off the air for a few hours a few weeks ago.
Those are the only two outages I'm aware of, though.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 27, 2004 10:12 PM (+S1Ft)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
My comment info went poof.
I have honked up my blog. Not bad mind you but honked it just the same.
Could I get somebody to look at my individual archive page/style sheet to see why the boxes and labels associated with them don't show up on IE but look GREAT on mozilla.
I am a world class moron who doesn't make backups before I change stuff.
Help a moron get a clue. Have pity.
Update:the boxes are 'there' you can click them, mru's show up, but highlighting won't select them. help.
Update: Feh, got rid of the html style crap that came as default and now it works swimmingly. Thanks for all the help everyone!
Posted by: spacemonkey at
02:42 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 116 words, total size 1 kb.
May 26, 2004
CheeseMistress Down!!
LeeAnn is ill. Her husband posted to let us know, but no details. Hopefully it's just inconvenient, and not serious.
We should all drop by and wish MuNu's Court Jester a speedy recovery, and offer all the support we can.
Posted by: PaulT at
06:54 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks a lot for sharing the article on cheese. That's a awesome article. I enjoyed the article a lot while reading. Thanks for sharing such a wonderful article. There are lots of information about on
cheese that also could be awesome.
Posted by: Allison at April 03, 2010 09:17 AM (oryFu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 25, 2004
FYF
FYF has a problem in its template... several. And for the life of my I can't find them or how to fix them. So if anyone would like to try and fix it, Id be much obliged.
Just leave a comment or something so I can give you access to the templates. And if your worried about screwing them up, don't because I'm saving them.
T'anks (in advanced)
UPDATE Thanks Madfish, but while I solved a few problems I'm noticing more... And those are leaving me even more clueless...
Posted by: Mookie at
09:37 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 90 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I've looked at your site. What exactly is it you want done... besides the right column being moved up?
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 25, 2004 11:11 PM (7phcR)
2
I need the individual/catagory/date archives fixed. Their all funky and I have no clue why.
Posted by: M 0.o kie at May 25, 2004 11:13 PM (ZjSa7)
3
I don't know if this would make a difference but you might try this in your Main Index:
Take the space out before the closing quote tags in these divs...
<div id="centercontent ">
<div id="rightcontent ">
It looks like you have too many close div tags under the close MTEntries tag. There usually are only two and I see four in your source code. I don't know if the extra ones are affecting the rest of the page or not.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 25, 2004 11:33 PM (rQ9MS)
4
Your Monthly Archives has this tag:
<div id="container">
However, your CSS doesn't have an #container to control it.
Your Individual Archives are funky becase the .blogbody has a left margin inside the #centercontent.
.blogbody {
width: 450px;
margin-left: 215px;
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 25, 2004 11:57 PM (rQ9MS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Minx Update?
This post on Michele's site, ASV, reminded me of blogging platforms. I'm curious to know if the issues she addresses there, are addressed in Minx.
I'm just being a curious George this morning.
Posted by: Auterrific at
01:59 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Is there a link to follow?
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 25, 2004 02:24 PM (7phcR)
2
Oops...there is now.

Sorry.
Posted by: Linda at May 25, 2004 02:26 PM (AWAw8)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 26, 2004 04:31 AM (kOqZ6)
4
A likely story.
I know you've had a lot going on, Pixy. I was just curious since Michele was mentioning the differences between WP & MT.
Posted by: Linda at May 26, 2004 01:46 PM (AWAw8)
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 30, 2004 01:29 AM (Nj8r1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NuMuNu?
I got tired of looking at this same old basic white MT template... have been for some time... so I thought I'd do something about it...
I got my buddy Pam to do a neat banner image for us using the gold color that was already in the banner text. Then I ran that color through the disgronifier to get some different shades. Then I did a new stylesheet - a really subdued, yet classy looking design. Then I added some thingys and doodads. Then I put it up over at the MadLab.
Go look at it and see if it would be OK to use over here. I've got another gig I've got to work on starting Thursday, so it will be taken down Thursday am Texas time. If mostly everyone likes it and Pixy says OK, I'll drag it over here and put it up for the group.
If not, no big thang... I'll use it somewhere else. As a matter of fact, it looks really tough with a solid black background... maybe I'll use it as a skin or something...
Anyway, go check it out while it's still up.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at
06:13 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Looks fine. It's simple, which is a virtue.
Posted by: Attila Girl at May 25, 2004 06:31 AM (i+lmP)
2
Nice work! I like it. (FWIW)
Posted by: Emma at May 25, 2004 11:14 AM (NOZuy)
3
I have nothing to say, other than I love the Bartender and I'd have sex with him in the champagne room....
....and I wanted to be comment 4001.
Congrats, Munuviana!
Posted by: Helen at May 25, 2004 11:29 AM (8qowm)
4
purdy, simple and fast - I like it
Posted by: Rob at May 25, 2004 12:31 PM (kXZI6)
Posted by: Ted at May 25, 2004 01:52 PM (blNMI)
6
Is the fact that it's brown, a hint? LOL I really like it. But, of course, you know
I love change.
Posted by: Linda at May 25, 2004 01:56 PM (AWAw8)
7
Looks good but there's one weirdness to the banner. The lighting on the letters indicates a southeast light source. The shadow is cast as if there was a northwest light source. End result is a visual oddity where the letters will alternately appear depressed and elevated depending on where you look.
Posted by: Jim at May 25, 2004 02:24 PM (IOwam)
8
Linda: It's actually supposed to be gold. I pulled the color off the banner image. It looks gold to me on this box anyway. I'll have to check it on my old box and on IE before I move it.
Jim: Turn your computer to where it's facing north. That should take care of any weirdness on your end.
Helen: There is no sex in the Champagne Room!
Rob, Ted, Emma: Thanks.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 25, 2004 03:05 PM (7phcR)
9
I like the gold! It's very regal...
Posted by: Susie at May 25, 2004 03:41 PM (SjXQL)
10
Very stylish. Great work :-)
Posted by: Harvey at May 25, 2004 06:59 PM (tJfh1)
11
Looks good, but I'm more of a chrome or silver guy than a gold guy.
Chalk it up to my Amish heritage. Gold is both "English" and "proud."
Posted by: ace at May 25, 2004 07:31 PM (iog7U)
12
My monitor colors are f'd up (blue is a problem) so I can't comment on the color (looks kinda bronze to me). Other than that -- I love it!!!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 26, 2004 01:17 AM (Af9Gv)
13
Jim hit on what was driving my eyes nuts. The drop shadow on the banner is on the wrong side. As a photographer, that kind of thing drives me bananas. Don't even get me started on the new Blogger templates that have drop shadows on both sides of the same object.
Posted by: Light & Dark at May 26, 2004 05:55 AM (Hrm9v)
14
The coloring of the titles looks brown to me...but, I AM colorblind (rare for a woman, I know). So....
Posted by: Linda at May 26, 2004 01:51 PM (AWAw8)
15
It looks brown to me on my old box with the old monitor. I'll check some more color codes and see if I can get it closer to gold before I move it.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at May 26, 2004 11:00 PM (rQ9MS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I.P.Banning Question
By all indications, I have garnered my first troll. A complete asshat leaving the vilest crap in my comments. I banned the specific IP address a few of of them but that leaves a lot of other possibilities for the SOB to get in.
How do I block a whole range of numbers at once?
Here are a couple of addresses it has used
165.121.24.190
165.121.26.76
165.121.24.97
Thank you for your support.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at
12:26 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't know of a way to ban a range of numbers but if he has a calling card you could blacklist that.
Posted by: Jim at May 25, 2004 02:03 AM (saeHM)
2
What I've done, and I think it has worked, since she doesn't show up anymore is by using a wildcard.
Enter in 165.121*
If I am incorrect about this, html gurus, please let me know.
Posted by: Linda at May 25, 2004 02:18 AM (AWAw8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
101kb generated in 0.2335 seconds; 70 queries returned 286 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.