September 30, 2004
Llama Nuts n Bolts Question
I have been having trouble lately getting our blogroll to load. The main column seems fine, but the site seems to get stuck towards the end of the upload, leaving the blogroll off.
Anything I can do about that?
-Robert the Llama Butcher
Posted by: Robert at
09:51 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It loaded fine for me tonight, Robert. I know Blogrolling has been having some
serious issues lately, so it could be something or their end too.
Posted by: Light & Dark at October 01, 2004 05:48 AM (eT6wp)
2
Your TTLB Ecosystem script comes before your blogroll section. The Ecosystem has been having some "issues" over the last few days; I've noticed it not loading on my site. I have it located close to the end of my HTML, so that if it hangs, it doesn't prevent the rest of the page from loading. You might want to put it after the blogroll instead of before.
Posted by: John Lanius at October 01, 2004 10:06 PM (Hs4rn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Debating Mu.Nu Style
Any interest in a debate party in the Mu.Nu Chat? The debate starts at 9:00. Stop by and vent, rant or cheer. I would offer to supply refreshments but this going to have be strictly BYOB for logistical reasons. This will also be a clothing optional event.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at
06:46 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That sounds like fun. I vote for it, but I might vote against it later.
Posted by: Ted at September 30, 2004 10:29 PM (ZjSa7)
2
Thankfully Ted accepted my last minute invite to chat the debate. Otherwise i would have been left talking to myself - and I don't really need a chat room to do that!!
I'll have to make sure to get the invite up sooner for the next one.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at October 01, 2004 04:56 PM (UquFN)
3
Darn, I missed it. Yeah, definately put up rhe invite a day or so ahead of time. Or, send out emails to a bunch of people like I did. After you left Susie and Pixy Misa showed up (though Stevie had to ask for directions and didn't make it in time), as did a bunch of bloggers from
Renata's World ...whatever that is.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 02, 2004 10:11 PM (4i/ez)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Basic MT Blacklist – step by step.
This is a followup to the
earlier primer that described what Blacklist does. Now it’s time to actually put it to work.
First, let's make sure it is turned on for your blog.
Go to http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/mt-blacklist.cgi If you’re not already logged in, you’ll be asked for your blog's username and password. Enter it. You’ll be brought to a screen as shown below. Click on the box labelled Configure.

This is the next screen you’ll see. You want to make sure that there is a checkmark in both the Comments and Trackbacks boxes. (you'll likely only see the title of your own blog, not the several that you see in this screenshot.) Then scroll to the bottom of the page and click Save Configuration.

Once you’ve done that, your blog is ready to take advantage of Blacklist’s automatic protection capabilities.
The majority of spam should get blocked before it reaches you, but if you find that your blog has received a number of spam comments (if it’s just 1 or 2, it’s just as easy to go into your admin page and delete them from there), you’re going to want to get into the Blacklist again, either by using the address you used earlier, or by clicking the De-spam link at the bottom of one of the comment notification emails you received. When you get to the Blacklist page, you’re going to click on the De-Spam button, which will take you to the page shown below. (If you got to the page via the link at the bottom of an email, you'll be taken directly to the De-spam page.)

Here, you can set the number of recent comments to check. I usually ask it to go through the last 2500, to be sure. It’s also worth asking it to check the last 15,000 or so the first time you do this - and only the first time, as it really stresses the server - in case you’ve got old spam comments hiding from a long time ago. (We're talking about the last n comments on all of MuNu, so that's why the search number needs to be so high). Once your number's entered, click Search.
If it finds any comments which it has been taught are spam, it will list them on the page, and give you the option of un-checking any that you actually want to keep (a good security feature). Once you’ve decided which to delete, tell Blacklist to get rid of them, and it will also rebuild the entries that need it.
If you have a whack of spam, but the Blacklist doesn’t find it, and you’re not thoroughly familiar with how to create new entries in the Blacklist, you can just wait a couple hours, and come back and try again. It’s entirely possible that in the meantime, an experienced user will have encountered it as well, and will have created entries that will let Blacklist find & clean yours. (Pixy is famous for doing this incredibly well) I’ve got some ideas for how to increase the likelihood of that happening, but that’s for another post.
So there are the the basic steps in the arcane art of the Blacklist. If anything's unclear, be sure to ask.
Paul
Posted by: PaulT at
07:56 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 559 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Thanks Paul! Great job!
I've updated our blacklist with the latest entries from the master list. One thing to look forward to in MT 3 is that MT Blacklist will do this automagically.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 30, 2004 10:48 AM (+S1Ft)
2
Try not to overdo the searching-15,000-comments thing, though, because that really slows the server down.
Once we're on the new server that won't matter so much.

Unless four of you do it at the same time. :p
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 30, 2004 01:11 PM (+S1Ft)
3
Added a wee edit to make that point clearer, Pixy. Thanks.
Posted by: Light & Dark at September 30, 2004 05:49 PM (eT6wp)
4
Thank you, Paul! I really appreciate your help!
Posted by: Linda at October 01, 2004 03:55 PM (mmKG+)
5
Excellent job, PaulT. Gonna go see if I'm registered right now... farkin' spambot prOn rat bastards....
Posted by: Tuning Spork at October 02, 2004 10:37 PM (4i/ez)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MT Blacklist primer.
Since
Linda & others have asked, this is just a quick backgrounder for Munuvians trying to get their heads around what Blacklist is and does.
Blacklist is a piece of code, or ‘plug-in’ that is installed into the core of Moveable Type to help block comment spam. Because it’s installed into the core of MT (not on individual blogs), its settings affect every blog at MuNu. And therein lies its greatest strength and its greatest weakness.
If a spam comment is received by one of us, and an appropriate entry made into the Blacklist as a result, any further attempts to add similar comments to any other MuNu blog will be automatically blocked. That’s good.
It also means that if a spammer dumps a huge amount of junk on us at once, before we have time to alert Blacklist to the problem, we can still retroactively add an appropriate entry to the Blacklist, then tell Blacklist to go back and look at all the last 1000 (or however many) comments, and automatically delete any that it finds that match the new criteria we just added, so we don’t have to delete them all by hand. That’s also good.
more...
Posted by: PaulT at
04:21 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 544 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Yeah--I've gotten attacked by the spambots a fair amount lately, and I had been wondering if there were a central blacklist for exactly this purpose.
I've been keeping a list of evil IPs, so I'll check back to see what I'm expected to do to get these in the central database.
In the meantime, I'd be happy to "sign on" to a rule to the effect that we close our comments after two weeks. For the record, the freshest post I've had attacked by a spambot was 20 days old.
Thanks for staying on top of this, Paul and Pixy.
Posted by: Attila Girl at September 30, 2004 05:36 AM (SuJa4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MuNu Mk III
Well, it came down to a bigger, faster server at our existing hosting company, Liquid Web, or an also bigger and faster but not quite as bigger and faster server at another company, Server Matrix.
Liquid Web kindly helped me make my decision by hiking up their prices twice in the past month. The Liquid Web server ended up at $350 setup and $339 per month, compared to the Server Matrix server at $199 setup and $219 per month. The Liquid Web server was nicer in some ways, but not $120 a month worth of nicer.
So, stats of the new server:
Dual Xeon 2.4GHz with HyperThreading™
1GB ECC memory (ECC = extra crunchy)
2 x 200GB disks (mirrored)
1500GB bandwidth per month
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
CPanel & Fantastico
Urchin web analyser thingy
I'll be setting up MT 3.11 and EE 1.1 on the new server rather than on the existing one, because that way I can play around without having to worry about breaking anything.
Although they specify 2.4GHz processors, that's really a minimum, and if we're lucky we'll get 2.8's instead. Also, they have HyperThreading™ so it looks like a quad-processor machine instead of just a dual-processor machine. In reality, it's only 10% or 20% faster, but every bit counts.
Now I get to play with my new toy for a while before I start moving people across. :D
Oh, and I think I've solved the problem with future bandwidth growth: The secret is reverse proxies.
Update: The folks at Server Matrix just called. They're setting up our server now. :D
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
03:27 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 266 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Can't wait to try MT 3.11 and EE. The bloody choices!
Ever figure out a way to help us donate. I'm a poor college kid, but I'd like to help a little if I can.
Posted by: Nick Queen at September 30, 2004 03:13 PM (PLRaO)
2
If you need any volunteers to test out 3.1, I'm available... I get 10 or 20 real hits per day and my content if for shit, so if something happens no one will miss out...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 30, 2004 04:43 PM (Ql9J6)
3
Oh and I'm already running EE1.1 if anyone needs template help...
Posted by: Rob at September 30, 2004 11:28 PM (WJnNT)
4
My kingdom for a paypal (or any other) button. Will you take a cheque?
Posted by: Simon at October 02, 2004 04:11 PM (5yScV)
Posted by: Jim at October 10, 2004 03:55 PM (GCA5m)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 29, 2004
Two IT Questions!
My chickens, I need some help.
First off, I am sick and bloody tired of comment spambots, and I want to close all posts older than 2 weeks. I can't keep deleting 300 comments a morning. It's whipping me. Does anyone know of a code (and where to put the code) to automatically do that?
Also, a pc question-I just replaced the fan in my pc, and now it shuts itself down (not just on standby, but actually closed down). Any ideas on how/where to change this on the settings, so that it will stop doing this?
Thanks!
-Helen
Posted by: Everydaystranger at
11:42 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 102 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Comment spam and the MT plug-in to close comments were touched on
here. I haven't looked into it myself, but it may start you in the right direction.
Posted by: Jennifer at September 29, 2004 02:33 PM (lLwcM)
2
I have a question for the more techie types among us... I've only got 5-6 spammed comments the entire time I've been with MuNuviana... what causes one site to get 300 a day and another site to get virtually zero... is it the site content... is it something in the spambot code that makes it attack a site after it finds a "hole" - if so, why not more followup spam to the ones I did get... anyway, just asking for my own edumacation.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 29, 2004 03:15 PM (Ql9J6)
3
I dunno, Bartender, but I'm with Helen. Spambot activity has been picking up over at my place, too. I'd like to know where that code gets posted in the template, and I'd like to understand Blacklist better, too.
Posted by: Linda at September 29, 2004 05:49 PM (mmKG+)
4
I came across a patch that might be helpful at: http://www.bloviatinginanities.com/archives/003211.php
The script is supposed to automatically close comments in older posts.
Posted by: Random Penseur at September 29, 2004 07:30 PM (LlPKh)
5
Sorry, that was duplicative! My bad.
Posted by: Random Penseur at September 29, 2004 07:30 PM (LlPKh)
6
I've been getting hit with spambots lately. Only about 4 a week, but it's enough to sympathize with Helen.
Posted by: Tom at September 29, 2004 08:32 PM (kmiNS)
7
But where in the template does one put said code? I am happily going to install it, just no idea WHERE!
Posted by: Helen at September 29, 2004 08:45 PM (2mqzj)
8
Helen;
You can't 'install' it. It's not a piece of 'code' for an individual blog. This is an instruction that gets sent via the command line, to the SQL database on the server that contains all the posts & comments for all of MuNu. We as users don't have access to that database, since the slightest error would screw up every blog on MuNu. Only Pixie has that kind of access.
Given that such a change would effect every blog here, I think it's time that a serious discussion was held about what to do about comment spam on MuNu. it's been bandied about, but no plan of action ever really established. It needs to be addressed, but in a way that takes into account the varying needs of the users, in as elegant (ie non ham-handed, as this particular method would be) manner as possible.
I have some suggestions/ideas, as I'm sure others do, and will start a post about specifically that.
I've also been working on a set of basic information about Blacklist, as I don't think it's ever been explained here, and I don't think everybody knows how to use it, or what the dangers are in it. Unfortunately the whole thing isn't ready, but I guess it's time to at least start getting the info out here.
I have a shoot to do, but when I get back in a couple of hours, I'll get the process started.
Posted by: Light & Dark at September 29, 2004 10:10 PM (eT6wp)
9
Helen - a followup on your PC question;
I'm not sure I understand what's happening. When is your computer shutting down? Do you mean that after being on for a period of time, it randomly shuts off without warning? Or do you get a 'the computer is shutting down' warning of some sort? Are you doing anything in particular when the shutdown happens?
What version of Windows are you running?
How old is your PC (approx)? Is it a laptop or desktop? Any additional details about what kind of computer would also help. And why was the fan replaced to start with?
Lots of questions, I know, but hopfully with some more info, we can get you fixed up right quick!
Paul
Posted by: Light & Dark at September 29, 2004 10:21 PM (eT6wp)
10
There are some MT addin thingys that can be set to run as a cron job that will close comments on all posts... the only problem will be that it will be a system wide procedure and everyone will have to "buy in" to the number of days we want to keep our comments active... I would think anything over a couple of weeks could be safely shut down, as mosr blogs display only the previous 7 days worth of posts... have Pixy let me know and I'll track it down again.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 30, 2004 02:35 AM (Ql9J6)
11
On the PC - if the fan isn't working well you could be overheating and getting a shutdown from that event. Check fan function and air flow.
Posted by: Jim at October 01, 2004 06:01 PM (GCA5m)
12
I like
the valuable info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and
check again here regularly. I’m quite sure I’ll learn many new stuff right
here! Best of luck for the next!
Posted by: chinese tea at June 09, 2011 02:22 AM (Hnz3/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
It's likely not worth mentionin'
I dunno, but I thought tonight's
Navel Gazin' Report™ was one of the best pieces of humor I have composed of late. What do ya'll think?
Posted by: Tiger at
05:47 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
The Eekage Is Over
And we still seem to be on the 800GB plan. :)
I'm still looking for a bigger, faster, shinier server, but for now at least I don't have to rush into it.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:04 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yay! Amazon.mu.nu anyone?
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 29, 2004 01:27 AM (f2TFE)
2
I dunno, seems I got a hefty DayPop spike today for a couple of hours.
Posted by: Tiger at September 29, 2004 05:52 AM (G5PGV)
3
Hey Pixy,
What is the name of the webhost outfit you use anyway? A blog friend of mine recently got shut down for excessive bandwidth and is shopping for a new host.
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at September 29, 2004 10:42 PM (JQjhA)
4
When the time comes, the offer help cover any associates costs still stands.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 29, 2004 11:05 PM (U3CvV)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 29, 2004 11:41 PM (+S1Ft)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 28, 2004
No Notification
For some reason, lately, I haven’t been getting email notification of comments.
Anyone know what’s up with that?
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at
07:53 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No, but I'll take a look.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 28, 2004 01:15 PM (+S1Ft)
2
Now it seems like sometimes I do, and sometimes I don't.
Posted by: David Boxenhorn at September 28, 2004 09:00 PM (zlp9e)
3
I have the same problem-sometimes I get the comments, sometimes I don't...
Posted by: Helen at September 29, 2004 11:43 AM (dKPoa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 26, 2004
Time To Moove?
Liquidweb came back and said they couldn't do anything for us. And it took them forever to actually say that.
So I'm currently looking at a server with another company, and we may end up moving house next weekend.
I'll keep you posted.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
10:59 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Contributions should be sent where?
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 26, 2004 02:33 PM (U3CvV)
2
I second what Stephen said... put out the tip jar, please.
Posted by: frinklin at September 27, 2004 12:27 AM (4k5pf)
3
Uh, yup. For those of us who can, please allow us to.
Posted by: Elizabeth at September 27, 2004 02:04 AM (Sqjve)
4
Yep, I still don't see that Paypal button. Even Paypal would agree this is a worthy cause.
Posted by: Simon at September 27, 2004 10:44 AM (FUPxT)
5
Pixy... if you decide to use Paypal (ipso facto Internet Morality Police), I would recommend not leaving ANY money in the account for ANY length of time... Instapundit had some links up to several Paypal alternatives...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 27, 2004 12:05 PM (Ql9J6)
6
MW - agreed. I've never actually used PayPal for receiving money, and I'm not sure I
can get it out, which is one reason I haven't put the button up yet.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 27, 2004 04:16 PM (+S1Ft)
7
Yeah, pay pal....pay pal.....pay pal.....
Posted by: RS at September 27, 2004 04:54 PM (JQjhA)
8
Pixy, getting the money in and out of Paypal is pretty easy. If you're prepared to use an existing credit card you just give them that and they credit and debit it as they go.
Posted by: Simon at September 28, 2004 09:29 AM (FUPxT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
questionable content
Is anyone else having a problem with people reporting comments not posting due to 'questionabl content', when the comment contains no such thing?
I've had a few lately, whereas I seem to be able to post comments with any old swear words I want in my own blog. And I've also been able to post other people's comments for them even though they keep getting the error!
Any ideas? Much appreciated :).
Posted by: goldie at
01:19 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yes... if the questionable content is marked as
h--p. That's what I'm getting.
Just delete the "h--p://" (imagine the real text) from the URL personal info field and it'll go through fine.
And, yep, the link to yer blog will automagically still include the h--p:// tag.
Don't know why this is happening all of a sudden, but there it is. Ah well. :/
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 26, 2004 01:43 AM (3bmI8)
2
Spork, you're a legend! thanks for that, I wouldn't have thought of it

.
Posted by: goldie at September 26, 2004 01:56 AM (stGoY)
3
Should be fixed now. "http" had been put on the Blacklist. I've removed it.
Posted by: Jim at September 26, 2004 03:52 AM (GCA5m)
4
Who is doing this stupid shit?
I just had to remove "yahoo.com" fer Christsakes....
Posted by: Stevie at September 26, 2004 04:54 AM (JtuoY)
5
Be careful out there, folks! :p
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 26, 2004 10:56 AM (+S1Ft)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 25, 2004
BLOGIVERSARY!!!
Hey, fellow Munuvians. I just thought I'd let you all know that today is my 1 year blogiversary. I'd like to thank Pixy Misa for rescuing me from BlogSpot and making it possible to keep posting for this long. Also, thanks to everyone who has come to my site, even if you were just browsing the MuNu blogroll.
That's about it.
Posted by: CD at
08:37 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
September 24, 2004
The Ongoing Eekage
(Click on the image for a full-size version.)

We've gone from less than 10GB per day to around 40GB. Which is rather more than I'd bargained for. Hope Liquidweb gets back to me soon, or I'm toast.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
06:06 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 24, 2004 04:40 PM (e+WQX)
2
Well, I'll do my part and ensure I write nothing witty or clever.
Posted by: BravoRomeoDelta at September 24, 2004 08:23 PM (9X/fX)
3
Are we talking golden-brown-done-to-a-turn toast or blackened-and-charred-roofing-shingle toast?
Posted by: Ted at September 24, 2004 09:20 PM (ZjSa7)
4
How's about a new rule: If ya hit the
big time yer out of the house.
We can't have Pixy Misa raising a hundred growed-up blogs now can we?
Then again, this may pass when the whole Ra
thergate frenzy finally fades. Let's hang in there for a bit more.
And, Pixy, swallow yer pride and put up a damm tip jar, will ya?!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 25, 2004 02:13 AM (MG1SI)
5
Over the side with overly popular blogs? I certainly don't have worry about that.
Posted by: frinklin at September 25, 2004 05:22 AM (4k5pf)
6
I'd
love to host a hundred blogs each having thousands of visitors a day - as long as I can plan for it in advance. It's just when it's a surprise that it's a problem.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 25, 2004 05:25 AM (+S1Ft)
7
Guess I shouldn't have posted that pic of me in my nightie....sorry about that!
Posted by: Susie at September 25, 2004 02:54 PM (aGSjc)
8
Pixy,
I posted PDFs of John Kerry's book The New Soldier and a number of other sites linked directly to them. Can you tell if that is the source of the trouble. If it is, they're gone, or at least renamed to break the outside links.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 26, 2004 04:10 AM (U3CvV)
9
The files are small less than 300k but if the links spread enough, and I have do way of knowing, it could ad up. I still get a dozen or do hits a day from some of the sites that linked to me.
I have renamed the files to break the outside links. Whatever it was contributing to the problem I hope it helps. And Sorry.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 26, 2004 04:30 AM (U3CvV)
10
One other thing. I posted the files on August 19th. Given a few days for the links to spread that seems to coincide well to your chart.
Again, if these files are the source of the problem or a major contributor, I apologize.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 26, 2004 04:38 AM (U3CvV)
11
Continuing my mea culpa I checked my bandwidth usage on CpanelX. For June I had about .3gb for July .4gb for August 9.8gb.
I should have shut down those links sooner it seems.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 26, 2004 02:43 PM (U3CvV)
12
Stephen, 10GB is not a problem.
Now, 137GB, that's a problem.
The new server I'm considering is only a little more expensive than the old one. It's not "managed", but then again, I don't really want a managed server. And it gives us a lot more bandwidth and processing power.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 26, 2004 03:10 PM (+S1Ft)
13
I'd-a thunk we would've had this problem back when we were all getting a thousand hits a day just for mentioning Nick Berg. Can this really be caused just 'cause Ace and Pet Jawa are getting more traffic lately? Hmmm.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 26, 2004 06:34 PM (TNFuZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 23, 2004
Archive Template Help
I want to change my archive template to look just like my main page template. I've tried several of my own homegrown tweaks and I'm doing something wrong. I just can't seem to turn it from a single column to a dual column. I figure that if I put all my links up in a sidebar in all of my archives, I might get some people to click around my blogroll, including my munuvian blogroll--more traffic all around!!
more...
Posted by: Rusty at
09:30 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 152 words, total size 1 kb.
1
First, change your archives where it says 'div id ="container" ' to 'div id="content" '... that will change the main column to your index page specs... then, copy paste your sidebar code into your archive templates... [SAVE] & [REBUILD]...
Don't forget to save a copy of your files before you start messing around with them... or you'll be sorry!!!!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 24, 2004 01:46 AM (Ql9J6)
2
I've never been Instalanched, either. The closest I got was several mentions at the Emperor Misha's (I broke the 30-comment mark with my tribute to Rachel Lucas!).
Rachel and Andrew Sullivan have quoted me, but didn't link me in the process. Ah well.
I think that the best way to get an Instalanche is to send Glenn yer post. But (and this is important) DON'T SEND HIM JUST ANY OL' POST. Wait until you really think you'vce hit it.
When you know -- beyond any doubt -- that you've written something that others will be glad they read, then send Glenn a message. Don't bug him with ordinary crapola... all he'll do then is jus' learn to ignore your emails in a New York minute.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 24, 2004 03:31 AM (APIH8)
3
Madfish, I understand most of yer instruction, but this:
"then, copy paste your sidebar code into your archive templates"
has me baffled. I'm interested in doing the same thing Rusty want to do, but what the fark is my "sidebar code"? Where will I find it...? How will I identify it?
Your help is gold, man. Talk to me like I'm a gifted six-year-old who doesn't know crap about computers!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 24, 2004 03:37 AM (APIH8)
4
Your code for your sidebar is mostly likely between <div id="links"> tags... you paste it into the archive templates after the </MTEntries> and 2 </div> tags... just like it is in your main index template... next stick yer finger into to wall socket and tst for current... you'll know it hot when you smell haor burning!
Is that about as clear as muddy water?????
[HaroldMan and YellowDog are both helping me right now... I hope they got everything right... for a change!]
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 24, 2004 04:29 AM (Ql9J6)
5
Evil Glenn must DIE DIE DIE!!!
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 24, 2004 04:30 AM (Ql9J6)
6
It was an email, my girlish figure was just icing.
It only took me a year of trying I gave him a gmail account have tipped him on a number of occasions he even linked to a post I submitted on Dean's World one time. I've debased myself plenty for this.
Still, Lileks links give more traffic at least on the first day of the -lanche.
Posted by: spacemonkey at September 24, 2004 03:11 PM (DN55C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Very strange things
Okay, so
my blog does this very strange thing (sometimes) when viewed in Firefox (and, I'm told, Safari and probably some other non-IE browsers).
Sometimes on the main page (and on the other pages) the first post present doesn't "word wrap" properly (or at all). All the other posts do, though. Then, if a link within the body of the post is visible you can just drag your mouse over it and the post pops into place with proper word wrapping and display and everything. It's fine after that.
I have to believe (both out of vanity and out of how it works) that this is not a problem in my CSS coding but is instead something going on with the browsers (because it displays well after the link is rolled over).
The other weird thing is that the page I stole the basic layout from doesn't have this problem at all. Is there something I can do, or should I just live with it?
Posted by: Daniel at
03:03 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's most likely somewhere in your HTML code then... I would nearly bet that you have some punctuation mark in the HTML somewhere that is lost or extra... so the browser tries to parse the code and forces it to do something funky...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 24, 2004 01:16 AM (Ql9J6)
2
Daniel, your template is
seriously borked in Firefox. I really hope you don't decide to just live with it - it'd be a shame to leave alternative browsers trying to view it through such problems.
Can you tell us the other site that uses the same stylesheet? Maybe we can spot a difference that's causing such weird behaviour.
Paul
Posted by: Light & Dark at September 24, 2004 05:25 AM (eT6wp)
3
But then how come it looks exactly how it should
after you run the mouse over one of the links? It seems to be reading everything perfectly then...
Posted by: Daniel at September 24, 2004 12:54 PM (Oc6V9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
No Pixy!
Pfui!
pixymisa.com, which I've had hosted elsewhere for years, has expired. I've poked the folks responsible with a stick, but in the meantime you can always reach me at andrew -at- pixymisa -dot- net.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:08 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
Haiku Contest
Victor, without asking me, mind you, has declared it
Joe Don Baker Haiku Day at annika's journal.
i turned it into a contest. There is a prize, if anyone's interested.
Posted by: annika at
01:43 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Of *course* I did it without asking! What's the point of hijacking comments if you ask?
Sheesh!
Posted by: Victor at September 23, 2004 01:20 PM (L3qPK)
2
Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
Posted by: 传奇私服 at December 21, 2010 11:17 AM (9Q7/3)
3
Whoa. That was a great article. Please keep writing because I love your style.
Posted by: 耐克运动鞋 at December 22, 2010 04:48 AM (9Q7/3)
4
I always appreciate people who share creativity with us.
Posted by: jackets at December 14, 2011 07:42 AM (upZbv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 22, 2004
Oops
I contacted our hosting provider to ask about moving from our 500GB plan to an 800GB plan, and they're getting me pricing on that.
Except that it seems that they had already mistakenly put me on the 800GB plan without charging me for it.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
04:43 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
PAYPAL BUTTON
PAYPAL BUTTON
PAYPAL BUTTON
PAYPAL BUTTON
Posted by: Linda at September 22, 2004 07:02 PM (9Pzdi)
Posted by: Tiger at September 23, 2004 03:12 AM (G5PGV)
3
Well, it's nice that we're on the 800GB plan, except that now that they know, they might take us off the 800GB plan.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 23, 2004 03:39 AM (kOqZ6)
4
What Linda said. You must put up a Paypal button.
Posted by: Simon at September 23, 2004 11:34 AM (GWTmv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bandwidth Bandwidth Eek!
Guess who has
these Sitemeter stats:
VISITS
Total 137,903
Average Per Day 3,655
Average Visit Length 1:14
Last Hour 2,331
Today 34,117
This Week 25,588
Bandwidth consumption, which had started to slow down, has now shot through the roof. I'm going to contact my hosting company and see if I can move to a higher plan without moving servers. I mean, well done guys, but so far today we've had more traffic than we did in the whole of March.
Oh, yeah:
Posted by: Pixy Misa at
12:54 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 83 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Everyone must really be laughing their asses off at my jokes... I'll try to tone it down a bit.....
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 22, 2004 01:05 AM (hntZP)
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at September 22, 2004 04:00 AM (U3CvV)
3
Er, sorry about the bandwidth thingy. I've went ahead and switched my main page to only show half as many entries. Also, a fellow munuvian has offered to help me reduce the size of my pics so that they will suck less bandwidth. Call it a belated birthday present. But Aussie Lord of the Munuvians, have no fear....I believe this is a temporary spike related to a couple of posts that got some extreme Googlage.
Another thing to boast about for we few and proud sons of Pixy Misa is that Ace of Spades has hit the big time and is now a Playful Primate.
PS-Just checked sitemeter. With 2 hours left to go in the day I'm pushing 48k unique visits today. Whoa!
Posted by: RS at September 22, 2004 04:14 AM (JQjhA)
4
Just as a matter of preference... I always set my graphics to save at either 75 or 96 dpi... and then I set the compression level (most of my files are jpg) to 50%... I haven't seen any image degradation on any of the images I have optimized to those specifications and no one has whine or complained about it, so I guess that works...
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 22, 2004 04:25 AM (hntZP)
5
Hi Rusty!
Congrats on the traffic - I just wish it was with regards to a happier event. Oh well.
I've emailed my hosting provider (Liquidweb) to see if they can help. Looks like we'll hit 50GB for the day....
I think we'll be okay for this month as long as you guys don't get any more big stories to break, but I'd like to have a margin for comfort so that you can just blog and not have to worry about this sort of stuff.
The thing is, the server costs $160 per month including 500GB of traffic, which is great, but after that it costs $1.50 per GB, which is not so great. We've never gone over the limit, and obviously I'd like to keep it that way.
(Of course, $1.50 per GB is nothing compared to internet providers in Australia who charge up to $150 per GB. There's a reason the server is in Michigan rather than here in Sydney...)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 22, 2004 04:35 AM (kOqZ6)
6
The problem is that I have always run these stories about you know what, along with pics, only now the terrorist zombies are doing this kind of thing daily!!!
Willie, ok, so how do I do that??? Is there a certain program you use for manipulating gifs and jpegs?
More bad news...it looks like another big day today!! Sorry. Pixy, if I started running blog ads and then donated some cashola to you would that help?
Posted by: RS at September 22, 2004 09:01 PM (JQjhA)
7
Willie or Pixy!! Sitemeter going through the roof again!!! I want to get these pics smaller to save bandwidth but don't know how. Please e-mail me with suggestions.
Posted by: RS at September 22, 2004 09:19 PM (JQjhA)
8
I use the image editing software that came with my scanner... MS Image Composer will do it also... on the menu 'File - Save As' there is a checkbox at the bottom left and a slider bar on the right that will left you increase the compression settings... let me know if you need anything else.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at September 23, 2004 12:28 AM (hntZP)
9
Any decent graphics program will do that for you. If you don't have a decent graphics program, you can download 30-day trials of Adobe Photoshop, Macromedia Fireworks, and JASC Paint Shop Pro.
Or download
Irfanview or
Xnview, which are very nice file viewers that can also do basic image manipulation, and are free.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 23, 2004 12:30 AM (+S1Ft)
Posted by: Victor at September 23, 2004 06:26 PM (L3qPK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 21, 2004
I really hate to ask it...
But I need help on my homework... or more importantly the Research Paper that lets me graduate!
Heh. So anyway, I have to write a research paper, and I need 7 sources. Only 1 can be a website.
My topic is:
Does a* government have the right to limit what people say on their blogs?
Now since its apparent that my main source of information is cut off from me, I've found a way around it. But it requires the help of bloggers. I can interview people to get the information I need. Idealy I would most like to talk to the bloggers in other countries, though my offer is extended to all. (I'll give ya links if you help... even though I'm not blogging-eh). So if you could email me at mookie_riffic @ yahoo dot com or leave a comment with your email, I'd really appreciate it.
*as in any government, including and not excluding the U.S. but I think the US is pretty clear on it.. ya know, the whole first admendment thing
So... Please?
UPDATE: I changed my topic to
Blogs are destroying corporate media's hold on the public
Posted by: Mookie at
10:20 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 196 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Feel free to interview me. I was an American Studies major, and am sort of a political and history junkie.
tbux-at-psualum-dot-com
Posted by: Tom at September 21, 2004 11:56 PM (kmiNS)
2
Well I'm happy to help. I worked in main stream (BBC) media for 6 years and am now an IT professional ... plus I'm an opinionated SOB and am happy to set up an IM chat provided we can work round the whole time zone difference - virtual jet lag gives me a real headache.
I'd also give Simon (simonworld.mu.nu) a shout as he is very involved in the current asian (chinese) blog furore!!!
Posted by: Rob at September 22, 2004 01:20 AM (WJnNT)
3
Since I sort of teach government at a University I might be qualified to help, but it would have to be anonymous.
Posted by: RS at September 22, 2004 04:16 AM (JQjhA)
4
If ya wanna go back to the basics, there's a link in the sidebar at
Consent of the Govcerned that's searchable.
Obviously the word "blogosphere" wont givce you any hints. But searching general themes of speech and the government's limits might help you out a little.
Good luck and happy hunting!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 24, 2004 04:16 AM (APIH8)
5
Oops! Neglected to mention that the searchable link is to the brilliant Federalist Papers.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 24, 2004 04:18 AM (APIH8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
98kb generated in 0.1451 seconds; 68 queries returned 280 records.
Powered by Minx 1.1.4-pink.