September 26, 2005

Movable Type 3?

Hi all,

Just curious if we will ever get a chance to move it on up, to the big time. If so can I have a piece of that pie?

English: What is status on Movable Type 3 exodus?

Please kind Pixy! Happy B-day, btw, missed that!

Posted by Nick Queen at September 26, 2005 04:24 AM | TrackBack
Comments
#1

What is status on Movable Type 3 exodus?

Doomed.

Technically, there's no problem.

Non-technically, I don't think we can do it. The new license precludes you from using it for a "hosting service", and I'm pretty sure that munu would count as such. (Expression Engine has the same license restriction, and I was told that I wouldn't be able to use it.)

We're going to have to move to another blogging package. Unfortunately, multi-blog support in the open-source world absolutely sucks.

Suggestions are very welcome.

Posted by Pixy Misa at September 26, 2005 05:48 AM
#2

P.S. I am still working on Minx, but now with MySQL rather than Metakit. Problems with Metakit killed the earlier version of Minx. MySQL has no such problems.

But since it's taken me so long to get going with this, I'm not making any predictions about when it will be ready. So if anyone knows of an existing package that will do the job, I'm all ears.

Posted by Pixy Misa at September 26, 2005 05:52 AM
#3

Guessing Wordpress sucked?

Posted by Nick Queen at September 26, 2005 07:48 AM
#4

Standard Wordpress doesn't support multiple blogs. There's another version, Wordpress Mu, which does - but it's not ready for prime time. It would be easier for me to finish Minx than to hack Wordpress Mu into something that will work for us.

Posted by Pixy Misa at September 26, 2005 09:26 AM
#5

The nicest blogging systems I've seen are Pivot and Texpattern. Of course, neither one supports multiple blogs...

Posted by Pixy Misa at September 26, 2005 09:30 AM
#6

The reason that multi-blog support is critical is that we currently have close to 200 blogs, and that number is going to keep growing. With Wordpress (or something like it), we'd have 200 installations of the software and 200 databases, which would be a maintenance nightmare.

Posted by Pixy Misa at September 26, 2005 09:34 AM
#7

I think they changed the criteria a bit with the last re-pricing. It looks like the only criteria that separates personal and business sites is the intent to make money. That's beside incidentals like GoogleAds, etc, too.

Posted by Jim at September 26, 2005 10:37 AM
#8

There's that, but there's a whole 'nother problem with running a hosting service. You can't even use the business version for that.

And they don't define "hosting service", which really doesn't help.

Posted by Pixy Misa at September 26, 2005 11:14 AM
#9

Those stinking rat bastards. Grrrr.

Posted by Jim at September 27, 2005 10:37 AM
#10

Well, it was pretty much a given once they started up TypePad. A service like that is much more profitable than selling MT at $100 a pop. But I wish they would define "hosting service"...

Posted by Pixy Misa at September 27, 2005 11:30 AM
Live Comment Preview
Post a comment









Remember personal info?